Legal Opinion

Eye v. Fluor Corp.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 21, 1997No. 4:95-cv-01323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

952 F.Supp. 635 (1997)

Ace EYE, Plaintiff,

v.

FLUOR CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

No. 4:95-CV-1323 CAS.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

January 21, 1997.

Richard F. Nash, Sr., Gary K. Burger, Jr., Brasher Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, Kurt D. Lord, Cremeens and Associates, Belleville, IL, for Ace L. Eye, plaintiff.

John H. Quinn, III, Jennifer L. Arendes, Armstrong and Teasdale, St. Louis, MO, for Fluor Corporation, defendant.

Michael P. Burke, Kelley Field Farrell, Bryan Cave, St. Louis, MO, for Doe Run Resources Corp., defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHAW, District Judge.

Th…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Robert Johnson Grain Company v. Chemical Interchange CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Buchanan General Hospital, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
  2. In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API