Legal Opinion
Gerlach v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1933No. 9597PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
This is an action at law in which appellant as plaintiff below seeks to recover damages for the alleged infringement by appel-lee of certain patents owned by him. No injunction or other equitable relief is sought, the only judgment demanded being a money judgment. The action was tried to the court without a jury. At the close of all the evidence the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the defendant, and based thereon entered judgment digmiss-ing the action upon its merits. From the judgment so entered, the plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Perry v. WigginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Hirning v. Live Stock Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Merriam v. HuseltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Hawthorne v. Bankers' Life Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Burke Grain Co. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Pocahontas Coal & Coke Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Jones v. GillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Becher-Barrett-Lockerby Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.