United States v. Moran-Toala
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, Circuit Judge:
Although juries are supposed to render verdicts that are consistent with one another, from time to time they do not. When this happens, it is well established that a criminal defendant cannot exploit any such inconsistency in the jury’s verdicts to secure a new trial. This appeal presents not a direct challenge to inconsistent verdicts, but instead a related question: whether the district court erred when it instructed the jury in effect that it was permissible to render inconsistent verdicts, and whether, in light of that instruction, the jury verdicts and judgment based…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Newman and ChiassonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- United States v. DemottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Commonwealth v. BinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- People v. RailColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.