Legal Opinion
United States v. Mitan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 21, 2012No. 10-2192PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.
Kenneth Mitán appeals his conviction and sentence arising out of his conduct in purchasing several business entities. He claims error in a number of respects, including government misconduct in monitoring his phone calls from prison while he was proceeding pro se and the calculation of the loss amount under the pertinent sentencing guidelines provisions. Discerning no error that undermines the validity of his conviction or sentence, we will affirm.
I
On December 18, 2008, a grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania returned a six-count indictment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Sean Michael GrierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Shillinger v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- United States v. HohnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- EVDOKIMOW v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- In re MitanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.