Legal Opinion

Bagwell v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 22, 1985No. 0448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action by Edward R. Bagwell and Edmund J. Alexander seeking an order for the sale of real property which is the subject of a life estate bequeathed to Alexander by the Will of George Alexander, his father. The defendants, persons claiming an interest in the remainder, cross claimed for a declaration of their rights under the Will. With consent of the parties the matter was referred to the master with authority to enter final judgment. The master concluded Alexander’s adopted son, Edmund J. Alexander, Jr., could not take as a remainderman under a devise to Edmund’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Limehouse v. LimehouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Parker v. MullenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. McGhee v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fenzel v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Pate v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. In Re Estate of HymanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Platt v. RomesburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API