United States v. Peach
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Michael Peach seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) following the denial by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas of his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (requiring a COA to pursue an appeal); Spitznas v. Boone, 464 F.3d 1213, 1217-18 (10th Cir.2006) (requiring COA to appeal denial of Rule 60(b) motion). He contends (1) that the district court erred in not allowing him to argue the merits of the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim that he raised in his motion for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Spitznas v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Moore v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Orestes Luciano Abreu, United States of America v. James David ThornbrughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. PeachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013