Legal Opinion
United States v. Orestes Luciano Abreu, United States of America v. James David Thornbrugh
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1992No. 89-4145, 89-5166 and 89-5173PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING EN BANC
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
The court, on its own motion, ordered rehearing en banc in these two appeals to consider the interpretation of the enhancement provision in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1988). The remaining issues raised on appeal are decided separately in two panel opinions filed simultaneously with this opinion. See United States v. Abreu, 962 F.2d 1425 (10th Cir.1992); United States v. Thornbrugh, 962 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir.1992).
I
Orestes Abreu was charged in a second superseding indictment with one count of conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Robert L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- State v. GrissomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- United States v. Salvador Parra, Also Known as Salvador Ledezma, United States of America v. Jose Alfredo Sotelo, Also Known as Ricardo DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Jackie Ray HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Morrow v. WinslowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.