Legal Opinion

United States v. Peach

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2013No. 13-3104, 13-3181Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Michael Peach appeals the district court’s denial of relief for prosecutorial fraud on the court in his 1995 criminal trial. Peach also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for grand jury transcripts, and he moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The government, in turn, asks us to dismiss these appeals as frivolous. We agree with the government and the district court that these cases are frivolous. Accordingly, we DISMISS Peach’s appeals, and we DENY Peach’s motion to proceed IFP.

Peach was convicted of various crimes in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Weese v. SchukmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Childs v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Werner v. UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. PeachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API