Legal Opinion
Coppola v. MacK
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1998No. 3:93CV2521 AHNPublished
1Opinion of the Court
NEVAS, District Judge.
After careful review and absent objection the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Ruling is approved, adopted and ratified. SO ORDERED.
RECOMMENDED RULING ON MOTION FOR ARTICULATION ON APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
MARTINEZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently pending before the court is the defendants’ Motion for Articulation on Application for Attorney’s Fees (doc. # 69). In their motion, the defendants ask the court to further articulate its March 15, 1996 ruling on the plaintiffs application for attorney’s fees by stating: (1) whether the plaintiff is entitled to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Floyd Frank v. Sally B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips, Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Raff v. MaggioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990