Legal Opinion
East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Department of Forestry & Fire Protection
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1996No. A064890PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
In this case we examine what evidence may be considered in a declaratory relief action which seeks to challenge the legality under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of a policy or practice employed by an administrative agency. The case, which arises from timber harvest plans approved under the Z’berg-Negedly Forest Practice Act of 1973 (Pub. Resources Code, § 4511 et seq.), is an appeal by plaintiff, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), from a judgment entered in a coordinated proceeding joining the utility’s petition for a writ of mandamus with…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ojavan Investors, Inc. v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Friends of Old Trees v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- K.G. v. MeredithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.