Kansas Mortgage Co. v. Weyerhaeuser
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Reno District Court. Action by the Hardware Company against Raueneahn and others, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Action by McCullam & Co. against the above-named plaintiff and the defendants, and Mary E. Abbey, W. H. Smith, and Lewis Padrick, to enforce another mechanic’s lien against the same property. Actions consolidated and tried as one at the March term, 1889. From the judgment The Kansas Mortgage Company brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
The Eussell & Wilcox Hardware Company commenced an action in the district court of Eeno cotmty to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on lots 22 and 23, in block 1, in Ott & Tewksbury’s addition to the city of Hutchinson. Eauenzahn, the owner, the Kansas Mortgage Company, a mortgagee, and Abbott & Fisher, were made parties defendant. This suit was commenced on the 1st day of September, 1888.
On the 24th day of September, McCullam & Co. commenced an action in the same court against all the above-named defendants, and Mary E. Abbey, W. H. Smith, Lewis Padrick, and Eussell & Wilcox,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennock v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Brooks v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Kelly v. RosenstockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Conrad v. StarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Middletown Savings Bank v. FellowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Haz-Mat Response, Inc. v. Certified Waste Services Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- American-First Title & Trust Company v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Basham v. Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Fitzgerald v. WalshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Lauderdale Power Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.