Legal Opinion

Greenleaf v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1908PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Civil aotioN, tried before 0. H. Allen, J., and a jury, at Ifall Term, 1907, of the Superior Court of CamdeN County. This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover damages for an alleged trespass on the lands described in the complaint. Plaintiff alleged title and possession at date of trespass. Defendants denied plaintiff’s title, and alleged ownership of the land, possession, etc. The jury found the issues for defendants.

Read the full summary

Civil aotioN, tried before 0. H. Allen, J., and a jury, at Ifall Term, 1907, of the Superior Court of CamdeN County. This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover damages for an alleged trespass on the lands described in the complaint. Plaintiff alleged title and possession at date of trespass. Defendants denied plaintiff’s title, and alleged ownership of the land, possession, etc. The jury found the issues for defendants. It appears that, prior to August, 1882, the lands in controversy were the property of one Henry Foreman. Plaintiff introduced a deed from the heirs of Foreman, who died…

1Opinion of the Court

CoNNOR, J.,

after stating tbe case: Conceding that tbe deed executed by tbe Sheriff to defendant, pursuant.to bis purchase at tbe sale of tbe land for nonpayment of tbe tax due thereon, is invalid and conveys no title, because of tbe statutory duty of tbe Sheriff to bid it in for tbe county, where no person is willing to pay tbe tax for some portion less than tbe entire tract, tbe question is presented, whether it does not constitute color of title, within the meaning of tbe statute of limitations. Revisal, sec. 382. There was evidence tending to show, and we must assume that tbe jury found,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Redfield v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Moore v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Avent v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Doe on Demise of Tate's Heirs v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1824
  5. Pugh v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Perry v. BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Perry v. . BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Burns v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Glass v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API