Glass v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The court below was correct in holding: (1) That plaintiffs derived no title from B. L. Borland, and (2) that the unregistered deed appearing in the chain of title to the property in question did not prevent subsequent deeds in the chain, which are duly registered, being color of title under which, title may be ripened by adverse possession as against creditors and purchasers for value of the grantor in such unregistered deed. This conclusion is not in conflict with the Connor Act, C. S., 3309, and gives effect to the.statute relating to adverse possession under color of title, 0. S., 428.
Cons…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Collins v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Austin v. . StatenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Doe on Demise of Tate's Heirs v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1824
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dorman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Dorman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Bowden v. BowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.