Legal Opinion

Staton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1983No. 80-811PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

Following a jury trial appellant was found guilty of rape while armed, D.C.Code §§ 22-2801, -3202 (1981) and armed robbery, id. §§ 22-2901, -3202, and sentenced to concurrent terms of 10 to 30 years. Thereafter he noted this appeal, in which he contends that the trial court erred in: 1) permitting the government to impeach a defense witness by eliciting certain evidence of bias; 2) admitting into evidence a confession that related to an uncharged offense, and 3) admitting into evidence a confession that was involuntary. While we reject appellant’s first and second…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Hollingsworth v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Garris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Beynum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Rogers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API