Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1987No. 84-705PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of armed robbery, 1 carrying a pistol without a license, 2 possession of an unregistered firearm, 3 and possession of ammunition without a registration certificate. 4 Concluding that the trial court abused its discretion in three respects and that appellant’s defense was thereby prejudiced, we reverse the armed robbery conviction and remand the case for a new trial on that charge. The convictions on the pistol and ammunition charges, however, are affirmed.

I

On the afternoon of February 15, 1983, Frederick Baker went to a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Flores v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Smith v. HyltonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API