Legal Opinion

Stanley-Thompson Liquor Co. v. Southern Colorado Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1919No. 9097PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Las Animas District Court, Hon. Granby Hilly&r, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen.

This is an action brought by The Southern Colorado Mercantile Company, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, against The Stanley-Thompson Liquor Company, defendant, to recover the sum of $19.43 claimed to be due as an unpaid balance on a bill of $97.28 for liquor sold by plaintiff to defendant.

The defendant pleaded, and at the trial sought to prove, the defense of accord and satisfaction. At the close of the evidence each party moved for a directed verdict in its behalf respectively. The court sustained the motion of the plaintiff, and instructed the jury to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berdell v. BissellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  2. Harvey v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. New York Life Insurance v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. Michigan Leather Co. v. FoyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schnell v. . PerlmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Marton Remodeling v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Frazier v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. First National Bank v. White-Dulaney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Tates, Inc. v. Little America Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API