Legal Opinion

George A. And Meryl Collman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1975No. 73--2797PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before KOELSCH and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and MARKEY, * United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. CHOY, Circuit Judge:

The Collmans appeal from a Tax Court decision allowing them only a partial charitable tax deduction for dedicating 2.549 acres of land for public roadway purposes. We reverse in part.

Factual Background

In October, 1965 Coliman, a citrus farmer, purchased 15 acres of real property (hereinafter “the 15-acre grove” or the “grove” in Orange County, close to the City of Anaheim boundary line. The 15-acre grove was a rectangular piece of property, approximately 625…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Harold Dejong and Marjorie J. Dejong v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. Leon Schwab v. Bullock's Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Robert C. Stubbs and Mary Ann Stubbs, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Foster v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. Evans-Reid v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Conforte v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Ottawa Silica Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Graham v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API