Legal Opinion
CASINO REINVESTMENT DEV. v. Hauck
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 4, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
722 A.2d 949 (1999)
317 N.J. Super. 584
CASINO REINVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public corporate body of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant,
v.
Walter J. HAUCK and Virginia Hauck, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Respondents,
and
State of New Jersey, National Westminster Bank, John Doe(s), an unknown claimant(s), fictitious name(s), who is (are) or may be tenant(s), City of Atlantic City and Atlantic City Municipal Utilities Authority, Defendants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 2, 1998.
Decided January 4, 1999.
Peter H.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- STATE, HIGHWAY COMM'R v. GorgaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CaoiliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. KuglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Rockaway v. DonofrioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. HauckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Saddle River v. 66 EAST ALLENDALE.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Township of West Windsor v. NierenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Mount Laurel Township v. StanleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, ETC. VS. ESTATE OF MILTON RUBIN (L-3605-14 AND L-2436-14, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.