Legal Opinion

Mount Laurel Township v. Stanley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 21, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Our State Constitution specifically provides that “[pjrivate property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation,” N.J. Const, art. I, ¶ 20. That limitation on governmental power mirrors the restrictions present in the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution: “[N]or shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.” U.S. Const, amend V. The procedural protections required to implement those constitutional mandates are set forth in the Eminent Domain Act of 1971, N.J.S.A. 20:3-1 to -50. Thus, if a public or private entity seeks to condemn private…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. Township of West Windsor v. NierenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Township of Piscataway v. South Washington Avenue, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Asbury Park v. Asbury Park TowersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  3. MILLTOWN-FORD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API