Legal Opinion

MacHost v. Simkins

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 14, 2004No. CA 03-867PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Wilma Machost appeals from the denial of her motion for new trial after a jury returned a verdict in her favor for $2,000 in her negligence action against appellee Gerald M. Simkins. Simkins’s liability was not in dispute. Machost had incurred $10,000 in medical expenses resulting from the accident, and Simkins conceded to the jury that Machost’s medical bills were both reasonable and necessary. On appeal, Machost argues that the trial court erred in denying the motion because (1) the jury failed to consider all issues relating to her claim for damages, and (2) the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Esry v. CardenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Depew v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Watkins v. Taylor Seed Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Dovers v. Stephenson Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Arkansas, Inc. v. Roll Off Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Bruce v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Wallis v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Gray v. MorelandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Bingham v. City of JonesboroCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API