Legal Opinion

Wallis v. Keller

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 2015No. CV-14-853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge

hOn February 20, 2013, motorist Katherine Keller rear-ended the vehicle driven by Mary Wallis in stop-and-go traffic on I-49 (formerly 1-540). Keller eventually admitted fault. Wallis filed a claim against Keller seeking damages for pain and suffering and mental -anguish. The jury found in favor of Wallis, but returned a verdict of zero damages. Wallis filed a motion for a new trial based on Arkansas Rule of Civil- Procedure 59(a)(5) and (6), which was deemed denied. Wallis appeals, asserting that zero damages was not a verdict the jury could deliver. We affirm.

I. Facts

At'trial, Keller’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Depew v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Kempner v. SchulteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Barringer v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. James v. Bill C. Harris Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Vivek Dicholkar v. Blake McMillonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  3. Miguel Escobar v. A&A Orchard, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  4. TFS of Gurdon, Inc. v. HookCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API