Wallis v. Keller
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge
hOn February 20, 2013, motorist Katherine Keller rear-ended the vehicle driven by Mary Wallis in stop-and-go traffic on I-49 (formerly 1-540). Keller eventually admitted fault. Wallis filed a claim against Keller seeking damages for pain and suffering and mental -anguish. The jury found in favor of Wallis, but returned a verdict of zero damages. Wallis filed a motion for a new trial based on Arkansas Rule of Civil- Procedure 59(a)(5) and (6), which was deemed denied. Wallis appeals, asserting that zero damages was not a verdict the jury could deliver. We affirm.
I. Facts
At'trial, Keller’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Depew v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Kempner v. SchulteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Barringer v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- James v. Bill C. Harris Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Vivek Dicholkar v. Blake McMillonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
- Miguel Escobar v. A&A Orchard, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
- TFS of Gurdon, Inc. v. HookCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Family Dollar Trucking, Inc. v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015