Legal Opinion

Bingham v. City of Jonesboro

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 5, 2005No. CA 04-172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olly Neal, Judge.

Appellants Herbert and Betty Bing-ham, after obtaining a judgment against appellee City of Jonesboro, served a writ of garnishment on the Bank of Jonesboro in an attempt to collect on the judgment. The Craighead County-Circuit Court quashed the writ, and this appeal followed. We reverse and remand.

The City of Jonesboro filed suit to condemn part of the Binghams’ property for an easement and deposited $21,424 into the court registry as just compensation for the taking. The trial court allowed the Binghams to withdraw that money for their own use, but the Binghams thereafter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Woodard v. HollidaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Arkansas Kraft Corporation v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Giem v. Williams, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Bailey v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. KW-Dw Props., LLC v. Ark. State Highway Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Villines v. North Arkansas Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Williamson v. Baptist Health Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API