Legal Opinion
Rylee v. De Fini
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1955Published
1Opinion of the Court
134 Cal.App.2d Supp. 877 (1955)
A. C. RYLEE et al., Respondents,
v.
NICKOLAS DE FINI et al., Appellants.
California Court of Appeals.
June 15, 1955.
Max Z. Wisot and Ted Sullivan for Appellants.
Vincent S. Dalsimer for Respondents.
BISHOP, Acting P. J.
The plaintiffs are faced with a dilemma, as they defend their judgment of $725: if the issues are restricted to the two framed as a result of a pretrial conference, the vital one of those issues must be resolved against them; and if the issues are as broad as the findings, then the evidence fails to support an essential finding.
The action is one for a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.