Legal Opinion
Manu Patel v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 7, 2004No. 03-1170PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Manu Patel, Chanchal Patel, and Mukti Enterprises, Inc. (“the Plaintiffs”) own eleven motels on Chicago’s far north side. After the Chicago City Council passed an ordinance designating the area surrounding the motels as a redevelopment zone and identifying the motels as potential targets for acquisition through eminent domain, the Plaintiffs filed suit against the City of Chicago, Mayor Richard M. Daley, and Alderman Patrick J. O’Connor (“the Defendants”). The Plaintiffs allege that the City’s placement of their properties on this acquisition list was arbitrary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basim Esmail, Zabco Enterprises, Incorporated, and Nazco Enterprises, Incorporated v. Samuel T. MacRane Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Flying J Inc. v. City of New HavenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Muscarello v. Ogle County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Kolton v. FrerichsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Peters v. Village of CliftonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Vision Church v. Village Of Long GroveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.