Legal Opinion
Members Mutual Insurance Company v. Tapp
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1971No. B-2678PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEAKLEY, Justice.
This suit is for uninsured motorist benefits. The recovery in the trial court of Avis E. Tapp, Respondent, against her insurer, Members Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioner, has been affirmed. 464 S.W.2d 377. We reverse and remand.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the intermediate court. Suffice it to recite here that the recovery was for personal injuries and damages sustained by Respondent when her vehicle was struck in the rear by one operated by James Earl Seale, alleged to be an uninsured motorist.
Under State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Matlock, 462…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Members Mutual Insurance Co. v. TappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. RatterreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Members Mutual Insurance Company v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Stanfield v. KrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.