Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Kroll

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1972No. 15900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is a suit for damages resulting from an intersectional collision. Judgment was rendered for the cross-plaintiffs based on a jury verdict. Rudy N. Stanfield sued Mrs. Kroll for damages. Mr. and Mrs. Kroll filed a cross-action against Rudy N. Stanfield alleging that his negligent driving was the proximate cause of the collision in which they suffered personal injuries and property damage. They joined Mr. and Mrs. J. R. Stanfield in the suit, alleging that they were negligent in permitting Rudy Stanfield, their minor son, to drive the automobile. They also sued State Farm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Myers v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CowleyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Members Mutual Insurance Company v. TappTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Chapman v. Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Irrigation Construction Co. v. Motheral Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. RatterreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API