Wineteer v. Kite
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, Presiding Judge.
This action was instituted by plaintiffs Wineteer, husband and wife, as a suit for a declaratory judgment against defendants Kite, also husband and wife. Plaintiffs sought the court’s declaration that a covenant contained in a sales contract under which they had sold defendants their interest in a supermarket was not binding upon them as an agreement not to compete directly or indirectly with defendants for a specified time in a specified area. In the alternative, and in the event the court adjudged the covenant to be valid and binding upon them as a “non-competition”…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Prentice v. RoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Kerrick v. SchoenbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Houston Transfer & Carriage Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Liberty Storage Co. v. Kansas City Terminal Warehouse Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Vendo Co. v. StonerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- MIDLANDS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. Apple Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Victor Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Grimm (In Re Greater Atlantic & Pacific Investment Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1988
- Adrian N. Baker & Co. v. DemartinoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Robert Kuntz, Kunodu, Inc., and B-K Interests, LLC v. EVI, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.