Legal Opinion

Wineteer v. Kite

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1965No. 24257PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Presiding Judge.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs Wineteer, husband and wife, as a suit for a declaratory judgment against defendants Kite, also husband and wife. Plaintiffs sought the court’s declaration that a covenant contained in a sales contract under which they had sold defendants their interest in a supermarket was not binding upon them as an agreement not to compete directly or indirectly with defendants for a specified time in a specified area. In the alternative, and in the event the court adjudged the covenant to be valid and binding upon them as a “non-competition”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Prentice v. RoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kerrick v. SchoenbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Houston Transfer & Carriage Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  5. Liberty Storage Co. v. Kansas City Terminal Warehouse Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. The Vendo Co. v. StonerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  2. MIDLANDS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. Apple Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Victor Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Grimm (In Re Greater Atlantic & Pacific Investment Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Adrian N. Baker & Co. v. DemartinoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Robert Kuntz, Kunodu, Inc., and B-K Interests, LLC v. EVI, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API