Legal Opinion

Somers v. Kane

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1925No. 24,428PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff and his brother owned a tract of land on the northwesterly shore of a small lake known as Nine Mile lake in Lake county. A railroad touches the lake on the southeasterly shore and furnishes the only means of transporting timber to market from that locality. In the winter of 1913 and 1914, plaintiff and his brother cut the merchantable timber on their land and banked the logs on the lake— the larger part on the ice, but some in rollways on the shore. They failed to make a sale of the logs, and in the spring placed booms around them, the ends of which were chained to trees…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lindsay & Phelps Co. v. MullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Osborne v. Knife Falls Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Weyerhaeuser v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Cotton Lumber & Mercantile Co. v. St. Louis River Dam & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Sheldon-Mather Timber Co. v. Itasca Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Somers v. KaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Iverson v. RegolaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API