Weyerhaeuser v. Foster
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in claim and delivery for the return of certain saw logs. The action was begun in Ramsey county, but defendant obtained a change of venue to Wadena county. At the trial there was a verdict for defendant. From an order of the district court for Wadena, county, Holland, J., denying their motion for a new trial, plaintiffs, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollin'S, J.
This was an action in claim and delivery, wherein plaintiffs had obtained possession of the property by means of the statutory bond and affidavit, and held possession at the time of the trial. There are but two assignments of error! The first is directed to a ruling of the court whereby, after the value of the property, as alleged in the bond and affidavit and in the complaint, stood admitted by defendant’s answer and at the trial, the plaintiffs, without even attempting to amend their complaint, were prevented from introducing testimony tending to show that it was of much less value. The…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Malsby v. GambleSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Park v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Fergusson v. ComfortMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- Somers v. KaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.