Legal Opinion
Somers v. Kane
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 8, 1926No. 25,072PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibeel, J.
Action of replevin in the district court of Lake county to recover possession of logs. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from the order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
The case was here before and is reported in 162 Minn. 40, 202 N. W. 27. The facts are stated there in detail.
In the logging season of 1913-1914 the brother of the plaintiff, to whose interest the plaintiff succeeded, cut logs on his land bordering on a lake in Lake county and put a part in booms on the ice and banked a part on skids on the shore. The logs were left as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Cargill Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- International Lumber Co. v. Bradley Timber & Railway Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Somers v. KaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. All Funds Presently on Deposit or Attempted to Be Deposited in Any Accounts Maintained at American Express BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Dickson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- Petersen v. SwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953