Legal Opinion

First Tennessee Bank, N.A. v. Dougherty

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 25, 1997PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McMURRAY, Judge.

We are called upon on this appeal to construe Rule 3 and Rule 4, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure in pari materia. The trial court determined that service of process in this case was not timely returned in accordance with Rule 3 and that the statute of limitations was not thereby tolled. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The basic facts are not disputed. The plaintiff here, First Tennessee Bank, obtained a judgment against the defendant on May 17,1983. On May 13,1993, the plaintiff initiated this action to renew the judgment and prevent the 10 year statute of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tennessee Department of Human Services v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Adams v. Carter County Memorial HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Anderson Fish & Oyster Company v. OldsTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Marion County Board of Commissioners v. Marion County Election CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Crowe v. FergusonTennessee Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barger v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Annie Davis v. Grange Mutual Casualty GroupCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  3. Charles Salsman v. Texcor Indus.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Glenn Basham v. Henry TillaartCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. Kimberly Urban v. Robin Nichols, individually and d/b/a Willow Brook LodgeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API