Legal Opinion

Tennessee Department of Human Services v. Vaughn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1980PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to examine the constitutionality of so much of Section 36-227(1), T.C.A., as provides that in a bastardy case an “alleged father shall not be compelled to give evidence.” We hold it to be unconstitutional.

I

Tennessee Department of Human Services, as assignee of Donna Rogers, filed its petition in the Juvenile Court at Memphis seeking a determination that respondent was the father of a child born out of wedlock, with the usual and appropriate award for support and maintenance. Pursuant to Section 36-227(1), T.C.A., the case was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ballard v. HerzkeTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MillbrooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. State v. MallardTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kenyon v. HandalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. State v. HodgesTennessee Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API