Legal Opinion

Marion County Board of Commissioners v. Marion County Election Commission

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1980PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

Various issues of constitutional and statutory construction are involved in this appeal as of right.

The foremost question is the meaning of the phrase “next election occurring after the vacancy” as used in Article VII, Section 2 of the Constitution of Tennessee. The Chancellor held that this provision contemplated the regular August election. We concur in that holding for the reasons, and to the extent, set forth in the opinion in McPherson v. Everett, 594 S.W.2d 677 (Tenn.1980), released simultaneously with the opinion in the instant case.

We identify and discuss the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern v. Beeler, Atty.-Gen.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Maner v. LeechTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Waters v. STATE, EX REL., SCHMUTZERTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Leech v. Wayne CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Williams v. CothronTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MallardTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LevandowskiTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. LyonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Jordan v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Shelby County Election Commission v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API