Legal Opinion
United States v. Pesaturo
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 9, 2007No. Crim. 06-10390-MLWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR DISCOVERY
LEO T. SOROKIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Docket #20) is ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court will hold a Final Status Conference in this case on October 26, 2007, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom # 14.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 10, 2007, Defendant Richard Pesaturo filed a Sealed Motion to Compel and for Discovery, seeking to discover for the purpose of preparing his defense the identity of an informant, and certain taped conversations and other materials in the possession of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Picinich v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Commonwealth v. ShaughessyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- United States v. BulgerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018