Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shaughessy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 19, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

At issue in this case is whether the Commonwealth’s privilege not to disclose the identity of an informant can be overcome on the basis of an affidavit submitted ex parte by the defendant.2 The particular question we must answer is whether the judge abused his discretion in accepting and relying on the ex parte affidavit without affording the Commonwealth access to it and an opportunity to respond to its contents.

The defendant claims that the judge’s handling of the matter was consistent with language that this and other courts have used in the past concerning the use of ex parte submissions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Commonwealth v. DouzanisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. AmralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. LampronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BonnettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. TapiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. CarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. D.M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. RuizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API