Legal Opinion
Bowling Transportation, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 15, 2004No. 01-2386, 01-2588Published
1Opinion of the Court
352 F.3d 274
BOWLING TRANSPORTATION, INC., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.
No. 01-2386.
No. 01-2588.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: June 20, 2003.
Decided and Filed: December 8, 2003. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc: March 15, 2004. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Konrad Kuczak, Dayton, OH, for Petitioner.
Christopher W. Young, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLATE COURT BRANCH, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
ON BRIEF: Konrad Kuczak, Dayton, Ohio, for Petitioner.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jan M. Sexton Salmi v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.