People v. Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*901OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the case remitted to that court for a determination of the facts (see, CPL 470.40 [2]) and consideration of issues not reached on the appeal to that court.
Defendant’s claim that the People failed to produce certain Rosario material, pertinent to the videotaped testimony of a witness thereafter deported, is not preserved for our review. When defense counsel brought the People’s omission to the attention of the Wade hearing Judge, he told her that his jurisdiction extended only to the Wade hearing, that…
2Cited by19 opinions
- People v. FeerickNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. TamayoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SanzottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. KearneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.