Legal Opinion
People v. Feerick
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1999PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
Defendants are all members of the New York City Police Department convicted of various crimes arising out of their entry into two apartments in a Manhattan building where they restrained and threatened the occupants in an attempt to recover a police radio. All four defendants challenge the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting their convictions for official misconduct (Penal Law § 195.00 [1]). Defendants also allege errors in the jury charge and assert that they are entitled to a de novo Kastigar hearing (see, Kastigar v United States, 406 US 441) 1…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. BanchNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. RogelioNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MAHER (KENNETH)New York Court of Appeals · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- The People v. William FlanaganNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mackin v. AubergerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.