Legal Opinion
Dublin v. UCR, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 21, 1994No. 9311SC958PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Based on the following findings contained in the 3 December 1990 order, Judge Bowen concluded that the case should be certified as a class action as to UCR and U-Can Rent I:
Based Upon the record herein and the arguments of counsel for the parties, the plaintiffs have established and the court finds that:(1) There exists a class of named and unnamed plaintiffs who have an interest in the same issues of law and fact, which issues include, but are not limited to:(a) Whether their contracts with defendants included finance charges in excess of those permitted under North Carolina’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Zenith Laboratories, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carter-Wallace, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Abercrombie v. Lum's Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
- Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Pitts v. American Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Crook v. KRC Management Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Jacobs v. Physicians Weight Loss Center of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.