Legal Opinion

Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 30, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

In an action brought under Section 7049 (4962), C. G. L., by the father against Miami Dairy Farms, Inc., for the wrongful death of his minor son, aged ten years', damages were claimed for loss of the son’s services to the father and for mental pain and suffering of the two parents. The jury returned a verdict for $1,000.00 damages.

On motion of the plaintiff father,- the court granted a new trial on the ground that the damages awarded in the verdict were inadequate. The defendant took writ of error under the statute, Sec. 4615 (2905), C. G. L.

The order granting a new trial is affirmed on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. DeVane v. BaumanSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winner v. SharpSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Gresham v. CoursonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. C. W. Latimer, Jr. v. Sears Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. TinsleySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Powell v. MarcusSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API