Legal Opinion

Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 27, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of the defendant in error, plaintiff in the court below, for damages sustained by the wrongful death of his minor son. The case was heretofore before this Court. See Miami Dairy Farms, Inc., v. Tinsley, 115 Fla. 164, 154 Sou. 852, in which we said:

“In action by father for death of minor child, damage recoverable is reasonable recompense for parental pain and suffering and value at date of trial of fair compensation for services which in reasonable probability child would have rendered to parents from time of wrongful death until child…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Florida Dairies Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. Fuller v. DarnellSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Miami Dairy Farms, Inc. v. TinsleySupreme Court of Florida · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klepper v. BreslinSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Corp. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Coon v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API