Legal Opinion

Barker v. Fordville Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 36,985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff, vendee in a land contract which he claims was induced by the fraud of vend- or ’s agents, defaulted in payments thereon. Vend- or, in pursuance of the contract, gave notice of such default, election to retain the payments made on the contract, and took and now holds possession of the premises. Plaintiff sued defendants to recover the money paid by him as a part of the purchase price of the property, the declaration counting on the fraud and containing the common counts in assumpsit. From a verdict for defendants, directed by the trial court, plaintiff appeals.

When plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warren v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Lenox v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Wegner v. HerkimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Merlau v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Stockham v. CheneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jim-Bob, Inc v. MehlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Lutz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  4. Walraven v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Bishop v. Hannan Real Estate ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API