Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Hannan Real Estate Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 122, Calendar No. 37,763PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Plaintiffs are residents of Mineral Point, Wisconsin; the defendant is a Michigan corporation engaged in the real estate brokerage business. At the time of the transactions in question, the Wisconsin statutes provided that no person, firm or corporation:

“Shall engage in or follow the business or occupation of, or advertise or hold himself out as or shall act temporarily or otherwise as a real estate broker or real estate salesman in this State, without first procuring a license therefor as provided in this section.” Wis. Stat. 1923, §136.01, subd. 5.

Any violation of the above provision was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Church v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Joslin v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. French Lumbering Co. v. TheriaultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bartz v. PaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gill v. S.H.B. CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Carolin Manufacturing Corp. v. George S. May, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dunham v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API