Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Hannan Real Estate Exchange
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 122, Calendar No. 37,763PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.
Plaintiffs are residents of Mineral Point, Wisconsin; the defendant is a Michigan corporation engaged in the real estate brokerage business. At the time of the transactions in question, the Wisconsin statutes provided that no person, firm or corporation:
“Shall engage in or follow the business or occupation of, or advertise or hold himself out as or shall act temporarily or otherwise as a real estate broker or real estate salesman in this State, without first procuring a license therefor as provided in this section.” Wis. Stat. 1923, §136.01, subd. 5.
Any violation of the above provision was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Church v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Joslin v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- French Lumbering Co. v. TheriaultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Bartz v. PaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gill v. S.H.B. CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Carolin Manufacturing Corp. v. George S. May, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Dunham v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937