Legal Opinion
Entex v. Railroad Com'n of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 11, 2000No. 03-99-00746-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
Appellant Entex, a division of Reliant Energy Resources Corp., 1 appeals a trial court judgment affirming an order by ap-pellee, the Railroad Commission of Texas (Commission). The issue presented is what rates a utility must charge when it purchases a gas distribution facility from another utility. The Commission ordered Entex, the acquiring utility, to continue charging the rates of the utility from which it acquired a new facility. The district court affirmed the Commission’s order. Because'we determine the Utilities Code only requires Entex to charge its own…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Dodd v. MenoTexas Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Centerpoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. City of Edinburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Guitar Holding Co. v. Hudspeth County Underground Water Conservation District No. 1, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
- Canas v. Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Guitar Holding Co. v. Hudspeth County Underground Water Conservation District No. 1, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.