Howell v. Inland Empire Paper Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Plaintiffs Howell brought this action against the defendant, Inland Empire Paper Company (Inland), for specific performance or reformation and specific performance of an alleged agreement for an exchange of real property. Inland moved for summary judgment, asserting the description of its parcel of land is insufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds and is therefore void and unenforceable. Summary judgment was granted and the Howells appeal. We affirm.
The land in question was described as follows:
Parcel A
Portions of Tracts 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 62, 63 and 64, West Farms Irrigated Tracts #3,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Powers v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Bigelow v. MoodWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Colonial Leasing Co. of New England v. Larsen Bros. Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- Dickson v. KatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Maier v. GiskeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.