Legal Opinion
Gronquist v. Transit Casualty Company
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 16, 1969PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 N.J. Super. 363 (1969)
252 A.2d 232
RICHARD GRONQUIST AND CARL H. GRONQUIST, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
TRANSIT CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided April 16, 1969.
Mr. Robert J. Maloof for plaintiffs (Messrs Hein, Smith, Mooney & Berezin, attorneys).
Mr. Walter E. Monaghan for defendant (Messrs. Schneider & Morgan, attorneys).
FULOP, J.S.C.
At the trial of this case the jury was waived and the matter was submitted to the court on a stipulation of facts and legal arguments. The issue presented is whether a passenger in an…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. FlanaginSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Centennial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Weathers v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. O'ROURKENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.