Legal Opinion

Hankins v. Maryland Casualty Co./Zurich American Insurance Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2012No. 2011-CA-01093-SCTPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RANDOLPH, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In July 2001, Kaye Hankins entered into a home-construction contract with Elite Homes, Inc. (“Elite”). An August 2001 soil-test report on the subject property recommended that “a stabilizing blanket of natural silty clays ... and/or compacted fill soils having a maximum 7-foot thickness” was required “to minimize the Yazoo Clay ... swell or heave potential to within limits tolerable to a strong slab foundation .... ” Hankins received assurances from Elite that the Yazoo clay “was nothing to be concerned about.” She moved into the new home in April 2002.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Palmer v. Anderson Infirmary Benevolent Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Trout Point Lodge, Limited v. Doug HandshoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Equifax, Inc. v. Mississippi Department of RevenueMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Steven Hayne v. The Doctors CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Vincent J. Castigliola, Jr. v. Mississippi Department of RevenueMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Dorothy SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API