Tiffany Construction Co. v. Hancock & Kelley Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
This appeal presents the interesting question of whether a supplier of materials should be classified as a materialman or a subcontractor.
This question arose out of two separate actions instituted by appellees-cross-appellants, Hancock and Kelley Construction Co. (Hancock & Kelley) and Diversified Petroleum Products, Inc. (Diversified) against appellant-cross-appellees, Tiffany Construction Company (Tiffany) its bonding company, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. and John Kissinger dba B & K Construction (Kissinger). The two separate actions were consolidated for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Basich Bros. Const. Co. v. United States Ex Rel. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Holt & Bugbee Co. v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chavez v. Tolleson Elementary School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Advance Leasing & Crane Co. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Marmis v. Solot Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Vulcraft v. Midtown Business Park, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.