Legal Opinion

Tiffany Construction Co. v. Hancock & Kelley Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 11, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2508PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

This appeal presents the interesting question of whether a supplier of materials should be classified as a materialman or a subcontractor.

This question arose out of two separate actions instituted by appellees-cross-appellants, Hancock and Kelley Construction Co. (Hancock & Kelley) and Diversified Petroleum Products, Inc. (Diversified) against appellant-cross-appellees, Tiffany Construction Company (Tiffany) its bonding company, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. and John Kissinger dba B & K Construction (Kissinger). The two separate actions were consolidated for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Basich Bros. Const. Co. v. United States Ex Rel. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Holt & Bugbee Co. v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chavez v. Tolleson Elementary School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Advance Leasing & Crane Co. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Marmis v. Solot Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Vulcraft v. Midtown Business Park, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API