Legal Opinion
Vulcraft v. Midtown Business Park, Ltd.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1990No. 18814, 18795PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants Vulcraft and Prosteel Distributors, Inc. (Prosteel) seek payment of $125,131.40 plus interest as consideration for steel construction material supplied to defendant United Steel Fabricators, Inc. (United Steel) for use by defendant-appellee Metzger Construction Company (Metzger) in the construction of Midtown Business Park. Plaintiffs-appellants filed a complaint seeking to foreclose on their claims of a materialman’s lien, demanding judgment for the amount owed, seeking treble damages on checks issued by United Steel but returned for insufficient…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Farwest Steel Corp. v. Mainline Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Gibson Steel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Jesse F. Heard & Sons v. Southwest Steel ProductsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Staley v. NewNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blue Tee Corp. v. CDI Contractors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Tabet Lumber Co., Inc. v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Regents of New Mexico State University v. Siplast, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Espinosa v. Roswell Tower, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.