Randall Printing Co. v. Sanitas Mineral Water Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county by three creditors of defendant mineral water company, incorporated under the laws of South Dakota, for the appointment of a receiver of defendant company and for an accounting of the amount unpaid and due from the individual defendants upon the stock in that company held by them respectively, and to recover judgment against the individual defendants respectively, for the amounts unpaid by them to the extent necessary to satisfy…
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Ramsey county by three creditors of defendant mineral water company, incorporated under the laws of South Dakota, for the appointment of a receiver of defendant company and for an accounting of the amount unpaid and due from the individual defendants upon the stock in that company held by them respectively, and to recover judgment against the individual defendants respectively, for the amounts unpaid by them to the extent necessary to satisfy plaintiffs’ claims. Defendant Thompson, in his separate answer, alleged that he never in any way authorized or…
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This action was brought by plaintiffs, creditors of defendant Sanitas Mineral Water Company, a corporation, to recover of the other defendants, alleged to be stockholders, balances alleged to be due. and unpaid on their stock. The case was tried to the court, and a decision rendered to the effect that plaintiffs were entitled to recover the amount of their claims from defendants Conger, Barringer, Fer-ring, and Thompson. Defendants Conger and Thompson each moved for amended findings and for a new trial, and each appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The facts are these:
Sanitas Mineral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- First National Bank v. Gustin Minerva Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Rogers v. Gladiator Gold Min. & Mill. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Rule v. Omega Stove & Grate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Galbraith v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Mackall v. PocockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Hoffman Motor Truck Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Courtney v. CroxtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Lebens v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.